Kupec Petr, PhD

The use of hydraulic binder materials for the improvement of pavement subgrade has many implications for the surrounding ecosystem due to the possible leakage of alkaline compounds. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of plants to remedy the subgrade affected by alkaline inclusion. To reduce the impact and return the subgrade to its original state, a phytoremediation process is studied. The impact of two materials commonly used for the subgrade improvement is analysed – fluid ash (slag) and lime+cement mixture. Three different mixes of plants – Mix A, Mix B and the native natural vegetation Mix N – are proposed. Totally 99 samples were collected and 990 specimens were chemically and geotechnically analysed and statistically evaluated. The success of phytoremediation process for both Mix A and Mix B can be observed. It is considerably higher for the undersurface alkaline inclusion than for the surface one. Mix B appears to be the best for fluid ash binder and Mix A for lime+cement mixture binder. It is worth noting that the native natural vegetation in Mix N also contributes to the phytoremediation process and that the appropriate plant selection – e.g. Mix A and Mix B – can accelerate this process.

Given the ongoing climate warming that can lead to water scarcity, water retention has been on the forefront of forest ecosystem services. Water harvesting pits on forest roads are one of the possible engineering measures that can help mitigate some of the negative impacts forest roads have on the hydrological regime of the forest ecosystem. The aim of the research is to inform the scientific and professional public about the function and potential of water harvesting pits under forest road culverts and to offer insight into the significance of expected benefits of these objects for water retention and improvement of forest stand hydrological conditions. In this study, standard engineering methods were used to design and build water harvesting pits connected and not connected to culvert mouths and to equip the whole surrounding area with soil moisture and water level sensors. During the two-year study period, a number of irrigation experiments were also performed. The goal was to observe and evaluate the distribution of water from the pits to the surrounding soil and forest stands. Even though water harvesting pits and similar water retention objects on the forest road network seem very beneficial on paper, data from our research does not fully support it. According to our results, the benefits obtained seem much smaller than originally expected to a point that the viability of such measures is probably very low both from the forest stand and water management standpoint. More research is definitely needed in a wider variety of conditions and with a longer time frame.

Given the ongoing climate warming that can lead to water scarcity, water retention has been on the forefront of forest ecosystem services. Water harvesting pits on forest roads are one of the possible engineering measures that can help mitigate some of the negative impacts forest roads have on the hydrological regime of the forest ecosystem. The aim of the research is to inform the scientific and professional public about the function and potential of water harvesting pits under forest road culverts and to offer insight into the significance of expected benefits of these objects for water retention and improvement of forest stand hydrological conditions. In this study, standard engineering methods were used to design and build water harvesting pits connected and not connected to culvert mouths and to equip the whole surrounding area with soil moisture and water level sensors. During the two-year study period, a number of irrigation experiments were also performed. The goal was to observe and evaluate the distribution of water from the pits to the surrounding soil and forest stands. Even though water harvesting pits and similar water retention objects on the forest road network seem very beneficial on paper, data from our research does not fully support it. According to our results, the benefits obtained seem much smaller than originally expected to a point that the viability of such measures is probably very low both from the forest stand and water management standpoint. More research is definitely needed in a wider variety of conditions and with a longer time frame.